I haven’t posted any running maps since Monday, since it was the last day I ran outside. All week it has been icy which forced me to do treadmill runs only.
And, I hurt my calves this week, causing me to postpone/cancel my scheduled long run today. See: my recent DailyMile.com note
andy running
UPDATE: Brooks Running (Brooks Sports) are providing me with a FREE exchange for my broken Brooks Racer ST 3 pair!
andy running Brooks Racer ST 3
I guess I’m not completely mid-foot striking. I started out well up on my fore-feet, and I thought I at least maintained a mid-foot strike style throughout my 4 mile run (30:07) on the awesome Woodway treadmills at Lifetime Fitness.
But, my right outer heel of my Brooks Racer ST 3 now looks like:
andy running Brooks Racer ST 3
I’ve never really paid attention to my running form even though I’ve ran a bunch of races (5K up to marathon). I had heard of mid-foot or even fore-foot striking, but it never really registered.
Recently, a tweet led me down a search until I found Newton Running’s “run better” page. The animation really drives home the point.
This morning I was conscious about my foot strikes, and had a fast and easy 4.67 miles.
andy running Newton
Make up your F’ing mind Andy! Thanks to Ryan’s comments on my previous post, I’ve decided to revisit using Emacs as my editor. This time I’ll make the time to learn Elisp to really appreciate this editor.
There seems to be smart tab-completion everywhere (file finding, command finding, …), which is nice. And, Ryan’s blog “M-x all-things-emacs” is an excellent source for tips and links on Emacs. I particularly enjoyed his post “Giving ido-mode a Second Chance”. The referenced screencast really drove home the importance of having an editor with a great lower level of composable tools.
andy Development Elisp, Emacs
Been using NetBeans the last few weeks, and like it. I’ve been IDE-phobic, mainly due to control issues, but NetBeans has eased my concerns with its standoffish options for non-NetBeans oriented builds and other tasks. I was able to build our app and not have that “Is my build the same as others?” question in my head. Plus, the IDE comes with many features (web stuff, versioning tools, etc.) already built-in.
I’ve been a Vim user for many years, but never felt comfortable using the various Java IDE plugins that are available. I tried Emacs a few times and had similar issues. For normal text editing, I’ll stick to Vim.
I’ll give Eclipse a try again too, I guess. For non-Java development (would be nice), I’ll consider other tools, while sticking to Vim if applicable.
andy Development Eclipse, IDE, Java, NetBeans, Vim
Yay! That’s out of the way.
andy Uncategorized